Open Stack

To whom might care,

We officially retired Containers SIG now [1].

If you hope to restart this SIG or related effort, it's possible to resume
this SIG,
have a new pop-up team (as Jeremy mentioned), or other possible formats you
think it might be.
Feel free to contact me or any TC members if you need help on these matters.

[1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance-sigs/+/783001/3


On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 9:56 PM Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:
>
> On 2021-03-25 21:28:29 +0800 (+0800), Rico Lin wrote:
> [...]
> > IMO, The goal from Containers SIG definitely provide great value
> > to Openstack community because we didn't have much work on
> > checking whether we reach great container support or not. Hance
> > don't really wish it got archived and retired. Still if no one
> > interested enough and have time to join and chair the SIG, we have
> > no option but to move it to retired state ("archived").
> [...]
>
> If there's a set goal for the group, and you can define what you
> think the end state would be like for "great container support" in
> OpenStack, then this may be better suited as a pop-up team (that
> model didn't actually exist when this SIG was originally created).
> Still, if there's nobody interested in working toward that goal, I
> agree there's not much point in keeping the group defined either as
> a SIG or pop-up.
>
>     https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/popup-teams.html
>
> --
> Jeremy Stanley


*Rico Lin*
OIF Board director, OpenSack TC, Multi-arch SIG chair, Heat PTL,
Senior Software Engineer at EasyStack
*Email: ricolin at ricolky.com <ricolin at ricolky.com>*
*Phone: +886-963-612-021*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210329/8f0dfd9e/attachment.html>