[Containers SIG][tc]Is any one interested on Containers SIG? Or should we retire Containers SIG?

Jeremy Stanley fungi at yuggoth.org
Thu Mar 25 13:51:03 UTC 2021

On 2021-03-25 21:28:29 +0800 (+0800), Rico Lin wrote:
> IMO, The goal from Containers SIG definitely provide great value
> to Openstack community because we didn't have much work on
> checking whether we reach great container support or not. Hance
> don't really wish it got archived and retired. Still if no one
> interested enough and have time to join and chair the SIG, we have
> no option but to move it to retired state ("archived").

If there's a set goal for the group, and you can define what you
think the end state would be like for "great container support" in
OpenStack, then this may be better suited as a pop-up team (that
model didn't actually exist when this SIG was originally created).
Still, if there's nobody interested in working toward that goal, I
agree there's not much point in keeping the group defined either as
a SIG or pop-up.


Jeremy Stanley
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210325/2b4873a8/attachment.sig>

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list