[release][OpenstackSDK][masakari] request FFE on OpenstackSDK for python-masakariclient

Artem Goncharov artem.goncharov at gmail.com
Thu Mar 11 13:21:52 UTC 2021

Hi all,

I have no problems with releasing another SDK version now. Currently 2 another mandatory changes landed in OSC, so it can be released if necessary as well.

As a food for the discussion - SDK is not only client lib, but also a lib used in the core components (afaik Nova). So just changing label is not necessarily helping (correct me if I misinterpret the meanings of lib/client-lib)


> On 11. Mar 2021, at 13:17, Herve Beraud <hberaud at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hello folks,
> As discussed this morning on #openstack-release the masakari team needs OpenstackSDK changes that haven't been released. They have been merged after the final release [1]. Those aren't landed in OpenstackSDK version 0.54.0 [2].
> Here is the delta of changes merged between 0.54.0 and 736f3aa1 (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/777299 <https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/777299>):
> $ git log --no-merges --online 0.54.0..736f3aa16c7ee95eb5a42f28062305c83cfd05e1
> 736f3aa1 add masakari enabled to segment
> Only these changes are in the delta.
> Do you mind if we start releasing a new version 0.55.0 to land these changes and unlock the path of the masakari team?
> Client library deadline is today.
> Also this topic opens the door for another discussion. Indeed it's questionable that openstacksdk should follow the early library deadline, for that precise reason. We release python-*client the same time as parent projects so that late features can be taken into account. It seems appropriate that openstacksdk is in the same bucket       
> All those safeguards are a lot less needed now that we move slower and break less things.
> That could be translated by moving OpenstackSDK from `type: library` [3] to `type: client-library` [4].
> Let us know what you think about the FFE.
> Let's open the discussions about the type shifting.
> [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/777299 <https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/777299>
> [2] https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/commit/b87ad4371321d5b0dde7ed0b236238585d5b74b3 <https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/commit/b87ad4371321d5b0dde7ed0b236238585d5b74b3>
> [3] https://releases.openstack.org/reference/deliverable_types.html#library <https://releases.openstack.org/reference/deliverable_types.html#library>
> [4] https://releases.openstack.org/reference/deliverable_types.html#client-library <https://releases.openstack.org/reference/deliverable_types.html#client-library>
> -- 
> Hervé Beraud
> Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat
> irc: hberaud
> https://github.com/4383/ <https://github.com/4383/>
> https://twitter.com/4383hberaud <https://twitter.com/4383hberaud>
> Kf31yCutl5bAlS7tOKpPQ9XN4oC0ZSThyNNFVrg8ail0SczHXsC4rOrsPblgGRN+
> RQLoCm2eO1AkB0ubCYLaq0XqSaO+Uk81QxAPkyPCEGT6SRxXr2lhADK0T86kBnMP
> F8RvGolu3EFjlqCVgeOZaR51PqwUlEhZXZuuNKrWZXg/oRiY4811GmnvzmUhgK5G
> 5+f8mUg74hfjDbR2VhjTeaLKp0PhskjOIKY3vqHXofLuaqFDD+WrAy/NgDGvN22g
> glGfj472T3xyHnUzM8ILgAGSghfzZF5Skj2qEeci9cB6K3Hm3osj+PbvfsXE/7Kw
> m/xtm+FjnaywZEv54uCmVIzQsRIm1qJscu20Qw6Q0UiPpDFqD7O6tWSRKdX11UTZ
> hwVQTMh9AKQDBEh2W9nnFi9kzSSNu4OQ1dRMcYHWfd9BEkccezxHwUM4Xyov5Fe0
> qnbfzTB1tYkjU78loMWFaLa00ftSxP/DtQ//iYVyfVNfcCwfDszXLOqlkvGmY1/Y
> B8qUJhBqJ8RS2F+vTs3DTaXqcktgJ4UkhYC2c1gImcPRyGrK9VY0sCT+1iA+wp/O
> v6rDpkeNksZ9fFSyoY2o
> =ECSj

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210311/eec19292/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list