[release][OpenstackSDK][masakari] request FFE on OpenstackSDK for python-masakariclient
Herve Beraud
hberaud at redhat.com
Thu Mar 11 14:57:05 UTC 2021
Le jeu. 11 mars 2021 à 14:22, Artem Goncharov <artem.goncharov at gmail.com> a
écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I have no problems with releasing another SDK version now. Currently 2
> another mandatory changes landed in OSC, so it can be released if necessary
> as well.
>
Thanks, then I'll proceed.
>
> As a food for the discussion - SDK is not only client lib, but also a lib
> used in the core components (afaik Nova). So just changing label is not
> necessarily helping (correct me if I misinterpret the meanings of
> lib/client-lib)
>
Good point, I added this topic to our meeting agenda to discuss more deeply
about that.
>
> Regards,
> Artem
>
> On 11. Mar 2021, at 13:17, Herve Beraud <hberaud at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> As discussed this morning on #openstack-release the masakari team needs
> OpenstackSDK changes that haven't been released. They have been merged
> after the final release [1]. Those aren't landed in OpenstackSDK version
> 0.54.0 [2].
>
> Here is the delta of changes merged between 0.54.0 and 736f3aa1 (
> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/777299):
>
> $ git log --no-merges --online
> 0.54.0..736f3aa16c7ee95eb5a42f28062305c83cfd05e1
> 736f3aa1 add masakari enabled to segment
>
> Only these changes are in the delta.
>
> Do you mind if we start releasing a new version 0.55.0 to land these
> changes and unlock the path of the masakari team?
>
> Client library deadline is today.
>
> Also this topic opens the door for another discussion. Indeed it's
> questionable that openstacksdk should follow the early library deadline,
> for that precise reason. We release python-*client the same time as parent
> projects so that late features can be taken into account. It seems
> appropriate that openstacksdk is in the same bucket
>
> All those safeguards are a lot less needed now that we move slower and
> break less things.
>
> That could be translated by moving OpenstackSDK from `type: library` [3]
> to `type: client-library` [4].
>
> Let us know what you think about the FFE.
> Let's open the discussions about the type shifting.
>
> [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/777299
> [2]
> https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/commit/b87ad4371321d5b0dde7ed0b236238585d5b74b3
> [3]
> https://releases.openstack.org/reference/deliverable_types.html#library
> [4]
> https://releases.openstack.org/reference/deliverable_types.html#client-library
>
> --
> Hervé Beraud
> Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat
> irc: hberaud
> https://github.com/4383/
> https://twitter.com/4383hberaud
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> wsFcBAABCAAQBQJb4AwCCRAHwXRBNkGNegAALSkQAHrotwCiL3VMwDR0vcja10Q+
> Kf31yCutl5bAlS7tOKpPQ9XN4oC0ZSThyNNFVrg8ail0SczHXsC4rOrsPblgGRN+
> RQLoCm2eO1AkB0ubCYLaq0XqSaO+Uk81QxAPkyPCEGT6SRxXr2lhADK0T86kBnMP
> F8RvGolu3EFjlqCVgeOZaR51PqwUlEhZXZuuNKrWZXg/oRiY4811GmnvzmUhgK5G
> 5+f8mUg74hfjDbR2VhjTeaLKp0PhskjOIKY3vqHXofLuaqFDD+WrAy/NgDGvN22g
> glGfj472T3xyHnUzM8ILgAGSghfzZF5Skj2qEeci9cB6K3Hm3osj+PbvfsXE/7Kw
> m/xtm+FjnaywZEv54uCmVIzQsRIm1qJscu20Qw6Q0UiPpDFqD7O6tWSRKdX11UTZ
> hwVQTMh9AKQDBEh2W9nnFi9kzSSNu4OQ1dRMcYHWfd9BEkccezxHwUM4Xyov5Fe0
> qnbfzTB1tYkjU78loMWFaLa00ftSxP/DtQ//iYVyfVNfcCwfDszXLOqlkvGmY1/Y
> F1ON0ONekDZkGJsDoS6QdiUSn8RZ2mHArGEWMV00EV5DCIbCXRvywXV43ckx8Z+3
> B8qUJhBqJ8RS2F+vTs3DTaXqcktgJ4UkhYC2c1gImcPRyGrK9VY0sCT+1iA+wp/O
> v6rDpkeNksZ9fFSyoY2o
> =ECSj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
--
Hervé Beraud
Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat
irc: hberaud
https://github.com/4383/
https://twitter.com/4383hberaud
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=ECSj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210311/c7e41f16/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list