[nova] feasibility to keep the two-company rule
melanie witt
melwittt at gmail.com
Thu Mar 19 20:48:45 UTC 2020
On 3/19/20 10:23, Balázs Gibizer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Nova has an unwritten rule that requires to have at least two companies
> involved in any new feature development (or even bugfix?). In the
> current Nova core diversity situation this rule puts extra burden to the
> remaining non Red Hat cores and I guess it also makes any Red Hat driven
> feature development harder. In parallel to working on increasing the
> size of the core team I suggest to reconsider dropping this rule.
I have historically always appreciated the two-company approval rule
because it ensures each patch has been reviewed with at least two
different and diverse company perspectives.
However I recognize that the situation has changed over time and we may
not have the luxury any longer to ensure diverse company approvals. I do
not wish to overburden the remaining non Red Hat cores with review
requests for approvals.
So, given the evolved landscape, I am understanding and open to adapt
our process to drop the two-company rule if there is such consensus in
the rest of the team.
Cheers,
-melanie
> Some discussion happened already on the today's meeting[1].
>
> Cheers,
> gibi
>
>
> [1]
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2020/nova.2020-03-19-16.00.log.html#l-90
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list