[all][tc] Moving PTL role to "Maintainers"
openstack at nemebean.com
Thu Mar 5 20:24:54 UTC 2020
On 3/5/20 12:29 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 3:07 AM Graham Hayes <gr at ham.ie
> <mailto:gr at ham.ie>> wrote:
> On 04/03/2020 22:43, Zane Bitter wrote:
> > On 4/03/20 3:08 pm, Ben Nemec wrote:
> >> On 3/4/20 12:57 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> >>> One cannot help wondering if we might get more Nova cores
> willing to
> >>> sign up for a 1-week commitment to be the "PTL" than we're getting
> >>> for a 6-months-and-maybe-indefinitely commitment.
> >> That's a really interesting idea. I'm not sure I'd want to go as
> >> as one week for PTL, but shortening the term might make it
> easier for
> >> people to commit.
> > The key would be to make it short enough that you can be 100%
> > the next person will take over and not leave you holding the bag
> > forever. (Hi Rico!)
> And also that the person you hand it off too won't have to hand it back.
> (Hi Tim!)
> > I've no idea where the magic number would fall, and it's probably
> > different for every team. I'm reasonably confident it's somewhere
> > between 1 week and 6 months though.
> Yeah - I am not sure the TC should mandate a number - some teams
> might be OK with the 6 months, while others will need to do 1 or 2 weeks
> I would like to think elections would NOT get held every 1-2 weeks or
> whatever the chosen PTL term is for a project? Its just a like...signup
> sheet sort of thing? What if more than one person wants to sign up for
> the same week( I can't think of why this would happen, just thinking
> about all the details)?
Yeah, this logistical problem is one of the reasons I didn't want it to
be a one week rotation. I guess maybe you could solve that by holding
elections each cycle, but selecting a pool of PTLs who could then trade
off as desired, but at that point I feel like you're back to not having
a PTL and instead having a maintainer team. It also seems like a
potentially complicated election system.
Plus it kind of introduces a problem with the PTL being the point of
contact for the project. If it's changing weekly then you lose most of
the benefits of having a single person other people know they can go to.
I'm also wondering if this actually solves the "Hi Rico!" case anyway.
:-) If a PTL leaves the position because their focus has changed, they
aren't likely to take it back even if the new person only technically
signs up for a week. When your PTL candidate pool is exactly 1 then it
doesn't matter if they're getting elected weekly or six monthly. I guess
the idea is for this to increase the pool size, and whether that will
work probably depends on the circumstances for each project.
Anyway, I still think it's an interesting idea, even if I have come up
with a few new concerns after further consideration. Maybe it's
something a few teams could experiment with initially and see if it
works and what timeframes are appropriate?
> -Kendall (diablo_rojo)
More information about the openstack-discuss