[tc][election] campaign discussion: how TC can solve the less contributor issue?
Ghanshyam Mann
gmann at ghanshyammann.com
Mon Apr 6 20:30:52 UTC 2020
---- On Mon, 06 Apr 2020 14:45:30 -0500 Graham Hayes <gr at ham.ie> wrote ----
> On 05/04/2020 02:09, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
> > This topic is a very important and critical area to solve in the OpenStack community.
> > I personally feel and keep raising this issue wherever I get the opportunity.
> >
> > To develop or maintain any software, the very first thing we need is to have enough developer resources.
> > Without enough developers (either open or closed source), none of the software can survive.
> >
> > OpenStack current situation on contributors is not the same as it was few years back. Almost every
> > project is facing the less contributor issue as compare to requirements and incoming requests. Few
> > projects already dead or going to be if we do not solve the less contributors issue now.
> >
> > I know, TC is not directly responsible to solve this issue but we should do something or at least find
> > the way who can solve this.
> >
> > What do you think about what role TC can play to solve this? What platform or entity can be used by TC to
> > raise this issue? or any new crazy Idea?
> >
> >
> > -gmann
> >
>
> This has been my hobby horse for a while :)
>
> Honestly, we need to highlight how people *using* OpenStack can
> contribute. As Artom correctly noted in a message above, we are pretty
> reliant on paid contributors, and with some of the traditional vendors
> pulling back we should be diversifying our reach to people who have
> traditionally felt it was too difficult to contribute.
>
> Also - (and this is Graham with his personal hat on, not his TC hat)
> I think that any company that is a high level sponsor of the foundation,
> and derives value from OpenStack should be pushing resources back
> upstream, and not just in sponsorship money.
>
> Some of the smaller foundation members donate not just CI resources
> to opendev, but also developers, and upstream contributions. This
> should be the done thing across all members.
>
> As part of this, we (the TC) should be able to say to these companies
> where the most value would be for contribution, which is something I
> think we have gotten a lot better at.
Yeah, I think this is the answer (one of which can practically solve this) I was looking for :).
Making users contribute resources as one of the mandatory things can solve
this for sure. I do not know what is the side-effect of that. I also do not know
why this cannot be implemented. Along with sponsor, we can make companies using
OpenStack interop certification/logo to do the same.
I am not sure TC can reach out to companies executive layer for asking resources, but
I think as TC, we can put this requirement to BoD or foundation as one of the things
to consider serious notes?
-gmann
>
>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list