---- On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 14:44:14 -0500 Jean-Philippe Evrard <jean-philippe at evrard.me> wrote ---- > Hello my friends, > > Here's what need attention for the OpenStack TC this week. > > 1. We should ensure we have two TC members focusing on next cycle goal > selection process. As far as I know, there is no one assigned to this > yet. And that's _very important_. Thanks evrardjp for updates. This is already started [1] and we have two proposals till now. I have sent a reminder to collect more proposals. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-August/008277.html -gmann > > 2. Jimmy McArthur sent us the results of the OpenStack User survey on > the ML [1]. We currently haven't analyzed the information yet. > Any volunteer to analyse the information (in order to extract action > items) is welcomed. It would be great if we could discuss this at our > next official meeting. > > 3. Our next meeting date needs to be decided (same time as usual). > Pleas > e use the framadate here [2]. > > 4. Our next meeting agenda needs clarifications. It would be great if > you could update the wiki [3], so that I can send the invite to the ML. > > 5. We have a vice-chair candidate, Rico. It would be awesome if you > could cast a vote on this nomination, if you didn't vote on it yet[4]. > > 6. There are plenty of patches that are waiting for your opinion. Have > a look at [5] to [10] for example :) > > 7. We may have multiple patches with too many dissenting votes. I will > abandon them if nobody is against that (pun intended). > > Thank you everyone! > > Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp) > > > [1]: > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-September/009501.html > [2]: https://framadate.org/6zASzWzX4ejkr4ae > [3]: > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting > [4]: https://review.opendev.org/684262 > [5]: https://review.opendev.org/681203 > [6]: https://review.opendev.org/681260 > [7]: https://review.opendev.org/681480 > [8]: https://review.opendev.org/681924 > [9]: https://review.opendev.org/680985 > [10]: https://review.opendev.org/682380 > > > > >