Open Stack

On 10/1/2019 7:29 AM, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote:
> Hello friends,
>
> Here's what need attention for the OpenStack TC this week:
>
> 1. We should ensure we have two TC members focusing on next cycle goal
> selection process. Only Ghanshyam is dealing with this, and we must
> help him on the way! Any volunteers? Thanks again gmann for working on
> that.
>
> 2. Jimmy McArthur sent us the results of the OpenStack User survey on
> the ML [1]. We currently haven't analyzed the information yet.
> Any volunteer to analyse the information (in order to extract action
> items) is welcomed. It would be great if we could discuss this at our
> next official meeting, or at least discuss the next steps.

JP,

I generally go through this for the Cinder team.  Since I will be in 
there I can review the comments and create an overview/action items 
before our next meeting.

Jay


> 3. Our next meeting date will be the Thursday 10 October. I will be
> travelling that day, so it would be nice to have a volunteer to host
> the meeting. For that, our next meeting agenda needs clarifications.
> It would be great if you could update the agenda (please also write if
> your absent) on the wiki [2], so that I can send the invite to the ML.
> I will send the invite on Thursday.
>
> 4. We still haven't finished the conversationg about naming releases.
> There are a few new ideas floated around, so we should maybe drop the
> current process to take count of the newly proposed ideas (The large
> cities lists proposed by Nate, the movie quotes proposed by Thierry
> [9])? Alternatively, if we can't find consensus, should we just entrust
> the release naming process to the release team?
>
> 5. We should decide to deprecate or not the PowerVMStackers team [3]
> and move it as a SIG. The votes don't reflect this.
>
> Thank you everyone!
>
> [1]:
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-September/009501.html
>   
> [2]:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting
> [3]: https://review.opendev.org/680438
> [4]: https://review.opendev.org/680985
> [5]: https://review.opendev.org/681260
> [6]: https://review.opendev.org/681480
> [7]: https://review.opendev.org/681924
> [8]: https://review.opendev.org/682380
> [9]: https://review.opendev.org/684688
>
>