Open Stack

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 3:50 AM Witek Bedyk <witold.bedyk at suse.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/21/19 9:53 PM, Nate Johnston wrote:
>
> > I know several very large sites (ingesting billions of records per day)
> > that run community InfluxDB and they get HA by putting influx-proxy [1]
> > in front of it.  I've evaluated it for large scale uses before as well,
> > and with influx-proxy I found no need for the clustering option.
>
> Similar architecture is followed by Monasca. InfluxDB instances can be
> assigned to different Kafka consumer groups and consume messages
> independently from the message queue. In case one of the instances is
> down all the measurements are still buffered and get persisted as soon
> as the instance is available again.

I'm curious on what the final decision of the Ceilometer team regarding
this discussion?

> Best greetings
> Witek
>