Are most grenade plugin projects doing upgrades wrong?
Elõd Illés
elod.illes at ericsson.com
Thu Jun 13 16:13:33 UTC 2019
Actually, if you check [4] and [5], they seemingly check out master, but
just below the linked line like 20 lines, there's a 'git show --oneline'
and 'head -1' which shows that the branch is clearly stable/stein. So it
seems there's no need for explicit branch settings in [1]... but I
haven't found the code lines which cause this behavior, yet...
BR,
Előd
On 2019. 06. 13. 15:45, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> While fixing how the watcher grenade plugin is cloning the watcher
> repo for the base (old) side [1] to hard-code from stable/rocky to
> stable/stien, I noticed that several other projects with grenade
> plugins aren't actually setting a stable branch when cloning the
> plugin for the old side [2]. So I tried removing the stable/stein
> branch from the base plugin clone in watcher [3] and grenade cloned
> from master for the base (old) side [4]. Taking designate as an
> example, I see the same thing happening for it's grenade run [5].
>
> Is there something I'm missing here or are most of the openstack
> projects running grenade via plugin actually just upgrading from
> master to master rather than n-1 to master?
>
> [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/664610/1/devstack/upgrade/settings
> [2]
> http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=base%20enable_plugin&i=nope&files=&repos=
> [3] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/664610/2/devstack/upgrade/settings
> [4]
> http://logs.openstack.org/10/664610/2/check/watcher-grenade/ad2e068/logs/grenade.sh.txt.gz#_2019-06-12_19_19_36_874
> [5]
> http://logs.openstack.org/47/662647/6/check/designate-grenade-pdns4/0b8968f/logs/grenade.sh.txt.gz#_2019-06-09_23_10_03_034
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list