On 08/02/19 13:15 +0000, Chris Dent wrote: > >Yesterday at the TC meeting [1] we decided that the in-progress task >to make sure the technical vision document [2] has been fully >evaluated by project teams needs a bit more time, so this message is >being produced as a reminder. > >Back in January Julia produced a message [3] suggesting that each >project consider producing a document where they compare their >current state with an idealized state if they were in complete >alignment with the vision. There were two hoped for outcomes: > >* A useful in-project document that could help guide future > development. >* Patches to the vision document to clarify or correct the vision > where it is discovered to be not quite right. > >A few projects have started that process (see, for example, >melwitt's recent message for some links [4]) resulting in some good >plans as well as some improvements to the vision document [5]. > >In the future the TC would like to use the vision document to help >evaluate projects applying to be "official" as well as determining >if projects are "healthy". As such it is important that the document >be constantly evolving toward whatever "correct" means. The process >described in Julia's message [3] is a useful to make it so. Please >check it out. > >Thanks. > >[1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2019/tc.2019-02-07-14.00.html >[2] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/technical-vision.html >[3] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-January/001417.html >[4] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-February/002501.html >[5] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/governance+file:reference/technical-vision.rst > >-- >Chris Dent ٩◔̯◔۶ https://anticdent.org/ >freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent Here [1] is an initial iteration on a vision reflection document for manila. Review comments and questions are of course welcome. -- Tom Barron [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/636770/