On 2/8/19 7:15 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > > Yesterday at the TC meeting [1] we decided that the in-progress task > to make sure the technical vision document [2] has been fully > evaluated by project teams needs a bit more time, so this message is > being produced as a reminder. > > Back in January Julia produced a message [3] suggesting that each > project consider producing a document where they compare their > current state with an idealized state if they were in complete > alignment with the vision. There were two hoped for outcomes: > > * A useful in-project document that could help guide future > development. > * Patches to the vision document to clarify or correct the vision > where it is discovered to be not quite right. > > A few projects have started that process (see, for example, > melwitt's recent message for some links [4]) resulting in some good > plans as well as some improvements to the vision document [5]. Is it worth knowing which projects have this underway? If so, do we want to track that somewhere? Colleen started generating notes for keystone [0] and there is a plan to get it proposed for review to our contributor guide sometime before the the Summit [1]. [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-technical-vision-notes [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2019/keystone.2019-02-05-16.01.log.html#l-13 > > In the future the TC would like to use the vision document to help > evaluate projects applying to be "official" as well as determining > if projects are "healthy". As such it is important that the document > be constantly evolving toward whatever "correct" means. The process > described in Julia's message [3] is a useful to make it so. Please > check it out. > > Thanks. > > [1] > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2019/tc.2019-02-07-14.00.html > [2] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/technical-vision.html > [3] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-January/001417.html > [4] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-February/002501.html > [5] > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/governance+file:reference/technical-vision.rst > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190208/1fbf9c17/attachment-0001.sig>