[openstack-dev] [swg][tc] Moving Stewardship Working Group meeting
jim at jimrollenhagen.com
Thu Mar 16 12:19:55 UTC 2017
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 5:17 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>
> Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:15 AM, John Garbutt <john at johngarbutt.com
> > <mailto:john at johngarbutt.com>> wrote:
> >> In the absence of tooling, could we replace the meeting with weekly
> >> email reporting current working streams, and whats planned next?
> >> would include fixing any problems we face trying to work well
> >> together.
> > This is a good idea, I've quite liked cdent's weekly placement update,
> > maybe something similar, and others can chime in with their own
> I was thinking we could use a status board to track the various
> activities / objectives / threads. As part of the status board the
> leader of each thread would provide a $time_interval update by a given
> deadline, and the workgroup chair would collect them all and post them
> (to a single email) on the ML.
> The update could have predetermined sections: current status / progress,
> assigned actions, open questions... If the open questions can't get
> solved in the ML thread resulting from the $time_interval update, *then*
> schedule an ad-hoc discussion on #openstack-swg between interested parties.
> In terms of tooling, we can start by using a wiki page for tracking and
> updates snippets. We can use framadate.org for ad-hoc discussion
Any reason not to just use storyboard for tracking? AIUI, it gives us a
board for free.
> Combined with extra activity on the channel, I think that would preserve
> all 3 attributes of the meeting (especially the $time_interval regular
> kick in the butt to make continuous progress).
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OpenStack-dev