Open Stack

On 17 July 2017 at 15:37, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Derek Higgins <derekh at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 12 July 2017 at 22:33, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>> Derek, it seems like you want to deploy Ironic on scenario006
>>>>> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802). I was wondering how it
>>>>> would work with multinode jobs.
>>>>
>>>> Derek, I also would like to point out that
>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802 is missing the environment
>>>> file for non-containerized deployments & and also the pingtest file.
>>>> Just for the record, if we can have it before the job moves in gate.
>>>
>>> I knew I had left out the ping test file, this is the next step but I
>>> can create a noop one for now if you'd like?
>>
>> Please create a basic pingtest with common things we have in other scenarios.
>>
>>> Is the non-containerized deployments a requirement?
>>
>> Until we stop supporting non-containerized deployments, I would say yes.
>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> --
>>>> Emilien Macchi
>>
>> So if you create a libvirt domain, would it be possible to do it on
>> scenario004 for example and keep coverage for other services that are
>> already on scenario004? It would avoid to consume a scenario just for
>> Ironic. If not possible, then talk with Flavio and one of you will
>> have to prepare scenario007 or 0008, depending where Numans is in his
>> progress to have OVN coverage as well.
>
> I haven't seen much resolution / answers about it. We still have the
> conflict right now and open questions.
>
> Derek, Flavio - let's solve this one this week if we can.
Yes, I'll be looking into using scenario004 this week. I was traveling
last week so wasn't looking at it.

>
> Thanks,
> --
> Emilien Macchi