[openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict

Flavio Percoco flavio at redhat.com
Mon Jul 17 15:10:12 UTC 2017

On 17/07/17 15:56 +0100, Derek Higgins wrote:
>On 17 July 2017 at 15:37, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Derek Higgins <derekh at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On 12 July 2017 at 22:33, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>> Derek, it seems like you want to deploy Ironic on scenario006
>>>>>> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802). I was wondering how it
>>>>>> would work with multinode jobs.
>>>>> Derek, I also would like to point out that
>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802 is missing the environment
>>>>> file for non-containerized deployments & and also the pingtest file.
>>>>> Just for the record, if we can have it before the job moves in gate.
>>>> I knew I had left out the ping test file, this is the next step but I
>>>> can create a noop one for now if you'd like?
>>> Please create a basic pingtest with common things we have in other scenarios.
>>>> Is the non-containerized deployments a requirement?
>>> Until we stop supporting non-containerized deployments, I would say yes.
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> --
>>>>> Emilien Macchi
>>> So if you create a libvirt domain, would it be possible to do it on
>>> scenario004 for example and keep coverage for other services that are
>>> already on scenario004? It would avoid to consume a scenario just for
>>> Ironic. If not possible, then talk with Flavio and one of you will
>>> have to prepare scenario007 or 0008, depending where Numans is in his
>>> progress to have OVN coverage as well.
>> I haven't seen much resolution / answers about it. We still have the
>> conflict right now and open questions.
>> Derek, Flavio - let's solve this one this week if we can.
>Yes, I'll be looking into using scenario004 this week. I was traveling
>last week so wasn't looking at it.

Awesome! Thanks, Derek.

Flavio Percoco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 862 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170717/b027170a/attachment.sig>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list