[openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict

Emilien Macchi emilien at redhat.com
Mon Jul 17 14:37:54 UTC 2017

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Derek Higgins <derekh at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 12 July 2017 at 22:33, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>> Derek, it seems like you want to deploy Ironic on scenario006
>>>> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802). I was wondering how it
>>>> would work with multinode jobs.
>>> Derek, I also would like to point out that
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802 is missing the environment
>>> file for non-containerized deployments & and also the pingtest file.
>>> Just for the record, if we can have it before the job moves in gate.
>> I knew I had left out the ping test file, this is the next step but I
>> can create a noop one for now if you'd like?
> Please create a basic pingtest with common things we have in other scenarios.
>> Is the non-containerized deployments a requirement?
> Until we stop supporting non-containerized deployments, I would say yes.
>>> Thanks,
>>> --
>>> Emilien Macchi
> So if you create a libvirt domain, would it be possible to do it on
> scenario004 for example and keep coverage for other services that are
> already on scenario004? It would avoid to consume a scenario just for
> Ironic. If not possible, then talk with Flavio and one of you will
> have to prepare scenario007 or 0008, depending where Numans is in his
> progress to have OVN coverage as well.

I haven't seen much resolution / answers about it. We still have the
conflict right now and open questions.

Derek, Flavio - let's solve this one this week if we can.

Emilien Macchi

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list