That adds more latency, I believe some vendor plugins do it like that (service VM). Have you checked out networking-ovn?, it's all done in openflow, and you have Ha (A/P) for free without extra namespaces, just flows and bfd monitoring. On Dec 4, 2017 4:22 PM, "Jaze Lee" <jazeltq at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > Can we put router into virtual machine rather than in namespace? Then > the HA, and devops will be more elegant. You can live mirage, and use > haproxy. > The namespace can not be live mirage. It is bind to the host and lose > flexible. > Or is there some talks or specs about this? > > -- > 谦谦君子 > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20171204/91972615/attachment.html>