Open Stack

Sorry, I posted the wrong line for TOSCA guys.
The correct link to TOSCA artifact here: https://review.openstack.org/#
/c/365631/. <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/365631/>

Best regards,
Kairat Kushaev

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Kairat Kushaev <kkushaev at mirantis.com>
wrote:

> TL;DR: Heat, Murano, TOSCA folks please review artifact structure
> proposed for Glare.
>
> Hi all,
> as you may know Glare is a project that provides binary artifacts for OS
> cloud.
> Glare allows developers to specify artifact structure that can be consumed
> by other services like
> Murano, Heat, TOSCA and others.
> One of highest priorities for our project is migration app-catalog to
> Glare v1. In order to do that we
> prepared py-files that defines artifact types for different artifact
> presented in app-catalog:
> Heat Templates, TOSCA templates, Murano packages.
> These artifact types define structure of the artifacts that can be
> consumed from Openstack App Catalog. We assume that artifacts hold the same
> structure when user deploys Glare locally. So in order to meet all
> requirements for future Glare use we need a feedback from appropriate teams
> on artifact structure (by artifact structure I mean list of attributes
> specified for each artifact type).
> It helps us to understand what we missed in artifact definition and
> address all requirements that different project may have(so integration
> with glare will be easier).
>
> Here is references to patches where we define a structure:
> Heat template and Heat environment(https://review.
> openstack.org/#/c/365629/)
> Murano Package(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/365630/)
> TOSCA template(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/365632/)
>
> Best regards,
> Kairat Kushaev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160906/cf450f39/attachment.html>