Open Stack

In addition, I'm the one of the folks who are working with the v3-only
gates, the main case that we are looking for is when the functional job is
working and the the v3-only is not, so everything related to this jobs, you
can just ping me on irc. :)

Cheers,

Raildo

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 6:27 PM Rodrigo Duarte <rodrigodsousa at gmail.com>
wrote:

> The function-nv was depending of a first test to be merged =)
>
> The v3 depends directly on it, the difference is that it passes a flag to
> deactivate v2.0 in devstack.
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Steve Martinelli <s.martinelli at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Adam Young <ayoung at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/26/2016 11:36 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Adam Young <ayoung at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Some mix of these three tests is almost always failing:
>>>>
>>>> gate-keystone-dsvm-functional-nv FAILURE in 20m 04s (non-voting)
>>>> gate-keystone-dsvm-functional-v3-only-nv FAILURE in 32m 45s (non-voting)
>>>> gate-tempest-dsvm-keystone-uwsgi-full-nv FAILURE in 1h 07m 53s
>>>> (non-voting)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Are we going to keep them running and failing, or boot them?  If we are
>>>> going to keep them, who is going to commit to fixing them?
>>>>
>>>> We should not live with broken windows.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The uwsgi check should be moved to a proper run utilizing
>>> mod_proxy_uwsgi.
>>>
>>> Who wants to own this?  I am not fielding demands for uwsgi support
>>> mysqlf, and kind of think it is just a novelty, thus would not mind see it
>>> going away.  If someone really cares, please make yourself known.
>>>
>>
>> Brant has a patch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/291817/) that adds
>> support in devstack to use uwsgi and mod_proxy_http. This is blocked until
>> infra moves to Ubuntu Xenial. Once this merges we can propose a patch that
>> swaps out the uwsgi job for uwsgi + mod_proxy_http.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The v3 only one is a WIP that a few folks are working on
>>>
>>> Fair enough.
>>>
>>> The function-nv one was passing somewhere. I think that one is close.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, it seems to be intermittant.
>>>
>>>
>> These two are actively being worked on.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribehttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Rodrigo Duarte Sousa
> Senior Quality Engineer @ Red Hat
> MSc in Computer Science
> http://rodrigods.com
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160527/64f26068/attachment.html>