Open Stack

On 05/27/2016 02:30 PM, Raildo Mascena wrote:
> In addition, I'm the one of the folks who are working with the v3-only 
> gates, the main case that we are looking for is when the functional 
> job is working and the the v3-only is not, so everything related to 
> this jobs, you can just ping me on irc. :)



Thanks, will do.  Just want to make sure that we treat failing tests 
like a fire alarm:  do not get used to seeing red on the tests, even if 
they are non-voting.  Its a sign of a deeper problem.

Yeah...a bit of a hot button topic for me.


>
> Cheers,
>
> Raildo
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 6:27 PM Rodrigo Duarte 
> <rodrigodsousa at gmail.com <mailto:rodrigodsousa at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     The function-nv was depending of a first test to be merged =)
>
>     The v3 depends directly on it, the difference is that it passes a
>     flag to deactivate v2.0 in devstack.
>
>     On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Steve Martinelli
>     <s.martinelli at gmail.com <mailto:s.martinelli at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Adam Young
>         <ayoung at redhat.com <mailto:ayoung at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>             On 05/26/2016 11:36 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
>>
>>
>>             On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Adam Young
>>             <ayoung at redhat.com <mailto:ayoung at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>                 Some mix of these three tests is almost always failing:
>>
>>                 gate-keystone-dsvm-functional-nv FAILURE in 20m 04s
>>                 (non-voting)
>>                 gate-keystone-dsvm-functional-v3-only-nv FAILURE in
>>                 32m 45s (non-voting)
>>                 gate-tempest-dsvm-keystone-uwsgi-full-nv FAILURE in
>>                 1h 07m 53s (non-voting)
>>
>>
>>                 Are we going to keep them running and failing, or
>>                 boot them?  If we are going to keep them, who is
>>                 going to commit to fixing them?
>>
>>                 We should not live with broken windows.
>>
>>
>>
>>             The uwsgi check should be moved to a proper run utilizing
>>             mod_proxy_uwsgi.
>             Who wants to own this?  I am not fielding demands for
>             uwsgi support mysqlf, and kind of think it is just a
>             novelty, thus would not mind see it going away.  If
>             someone really cares, please make yourself known.
>
>
>         Brant has a patch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/291817/)
>         that adds support in devstack to use uwsgi and mod_proxy_http.
>         This is blocked until infra moves to Ubuntu Xenial. Once this
>         merges we can propose a patch that swaps out the uwsgi job for
>         uwsgi + mod_proxy_http.
>
>
>
>
>>             The v3 only one is a WIP that a few folks are working on
>             Fair enough.
>
>>             The function-nv one was passing somewhere. I think that
>>             one is close.
>
>             Yeah, it seems to be intermittant.
>
>
>         These two are actively being worked on.
>
>>
>>
>>
>>             __________________________________________________________________________
>>             OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>             Unsubscribe:OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>             <mailto:OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>>             http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>             __________________________________________________________________________
>             OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>             Unsubscribe:
>             OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>             <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>             http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>         __________________________________________________________________________
>         OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>         Unsubscribe:
>         OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>         <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>         http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     Rodrigo Duarte Sousa
>     Senior Quality Engineer @ Red Hat
>     MSc in Computer Science
>     http://rodrigods.com <http://rodrigods.com>
>     __________________________________________________________________________
>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>     Unsubscribe:
>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160527/ed80b529/attachment.html>