Open Stack

The function-nv was depending of a first test to be merged =)

The v3 depends directly on it, the difference is that it passes a flag to
deactivate v2.0 in devstack.

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Steve Martinelli <s.martinelli at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Adam Young <ayoung at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 05/26/2016 11:36 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Adam Young <ayoung at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Some mix of these three tests is almost always failing:
>>>
>>> gate-keystone-dsvm-functional-nv FAILURE in 20m 04s (non-voting)
>>> gate-keystone-dsvm-functional-v3-only-nv FAILURE in 32m 45s (non-voting)
>>> gate-tempest-dsvm-keystone-uwsgi-full-nv FAILURE in 1h 07m 53s
>>> (non-voting)
>>>
>>>
>>> Are we going to keep them running and failing, or boot them?  If we are
>>> going to keep them, who is going to commit to fixing them?
>>>
>>> We should not live with broken windows.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> The uwsgi check should be moved to a proper run utilizing mod_proxy_uwsgi.
>>
>> Who wants to own this?  I am not fielding demands for uwsgi support
>> mysqlf, and kind of think it is just a novelty, thus would not mind see it
>> going away.  If someone really cares, please make yourself known.
>>
>
> Brant has a patch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/291817/) that adds
> support in devstack to use uwsgi and mod_proxy_http. This is blocked until
> infra moves to Ubuntu Xenial. Once this merges we can propose a patch that
> swaps out the uwsgi job for uwsgi + mod_proxy_http.
>
>
>>
>>
>> The v3 only one is a WIP that a few folks are working on
>>
>> Fair enough.
>>
>> The function-nv one was passing somewhere. I think that one is close.
>>
>>
>> Yeah, it seems to be intermittant.
>>
>>
> These two are actively being worked on.
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribehttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Rodrigo Duarte Sousa
Senior Quality Engineer @ Red Hat
MSc in Computer Science
http://rodrigods.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160526/8cc31908/attachment.html>