Open Stack

pybrctl repo is at: https://github.com/udragon/pybrctl
It is in pypi.

Looks like a wrapper around the shell brctl commands.  I don't think it
would buy us anything more than what moving neutron's current
implementation of doing brctl commands to neutron-lib would do.  In
fact, it might end up costing more.  That's just my very uninformed
opinion though.

Thanks,
Brandon

On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 23:59 +0000, Bhatia, Manjeet S wrote:
> Hi,
>  
> There is work in progress for pure python driven linux network
> configuration. I think most
> of work will be done with this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c
> /155631/ . The only
> thing left after this will be linux bridge configuration, Which I
> would like to discuss with
> community. There are two ways at the moment I can think to do that
> implementation,
> First, use pybrctl which may need some changes in library itself in
> order for full support.
> It will clean up the code from neutron. But looking pybrctl code
> which is just executing
> Shell commands, another solution which Brandon Logan discussed is
> move the existing
> Code for executing those commands to neutron-lib, which I think is
> better solution. I would
> like to have views of community, especially people working neutron-
> lib about moving
> python code for executing brctl commands to neutron-lib.
>  
>  
> Thanks and Regards !
> Manjeet Singh Bhatia