[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Team meeting on Tuesday 1400UTC
Andreas Scheuring
scheuran at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Jan 20 08:11:19 UTC 2016
+1 for Kyles proposal as well!
I think we can give it a try. If we realize that it becomes kind of a
"second class" meeting, as only less people will join or that the
meeting has no impact, we still can go back to the weekly meeting slot
on Monday IMO.
Andreas (IRC: scheuran)
On Mi, 2016-01-20 at 10:29 +0530, Vikram Choudhary wrote:
> +1 for Kyle's suggestion
>
>
> Thanks
> Vikram
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Martin Hickey
> <martin.hickey at ie.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 for me on Kyle's suggestion.
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
> Inactive hide details for Kyle Mestery ---19/01/2016
> 16:39:05---On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
> <ihrachys at redKyle Mestery ---19/01/2016 16:39:05---On Tue, Jan
> 19, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at redhat.com>
> wrote: > Rossella Sblendido
>
> From: Kyle Mestery <mestery at mestery.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
> questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Date: 19/01/2016 16:39
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Team meeting on Tuesday
> 1400UTC
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
> <ihrachys at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Rossella Sblendido <rsblendido at suse.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 01/19/2016 04:36 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thinking of this, I had another idea, a bit raw yet.
> >>>
> >>> But how does it sound to have two meetings a week, one in
> a EU/ASIA
> >>> friendlier
> >>> timezone, and another for USA/AU (current one), with
> different chairs.
> >>>
> >>> We don't impose unnatural-working hours (too early, too
> late for family,
> >>> etc..)
> >>> to anyone, we encourage gathering as a community (may be
> split by
> >>> timezones, but
> >>> it feels more human and faster than ML conversations..)
> and also people
> >>> able
> >>> to make to both, could serve as bridges for both meetings.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts?
> >>
> >>
> >> I think that is what Kyle was proposing and if I am not
> wrong that's what
> >> they do in nova.
> >
> >
> > My understanding is that Kyle proposed to switch back to
> bi-weekly
> > alternating meetings, and have a separate chair for each.
> >
> > I think Kyle’s suggestion is wiser since it won’t leave the
> community split
> > into two separate parts, and it won’t waste two hours each
> week where we
> > could make it with just one.
> >
> Yes, I was proposing two bi-weekly meetings with different
> chairs. We
> could even have kept the existing schedule and just had a
> different
> chair for the 1400UTC meeting on Tuesday.
>
> > Ihar
> >
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
-----
Andreas (IRC: scheuran)
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list