Open Stack

Mondays 21UTC and Tuesdays 14UTC are OK for me, so personally I do not have problem to attend both meetings, but I know that for someone one or another can be in the middle of night.
In this case, would be good to again have bi-weekly to allow attendance at least once per two weeks.

+1 for Kyle's suggestion about different chairs and restoration of abandoned meetings on Tuesdays.

-- 
 Dariusz (dasm) Smigiel
 Intel Technology Poland


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vikram Choudhary [mailto:vikschw at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 6:00 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Team meeting on Tuesday 1400UTC
> 
> +1 for Kyle's suggestion
> 
> Thanks
> Vikram
> 
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Martin Hickey <martin.hickey at ie.ibm.com
> <mailto:martin.hickey at ie.ibm.com> > wrote:
> 
> 
> 	Hi,
> 
> 	+1 for me on Kyle's suggestion.
> 
> 	Regards,
> 	Martin
> 
> 	Kyle Mestery ---19/01/2016 16:39:05---On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:14
> AM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at redhat.com <mailto:ihrachys at redhat.com>
> > wrote: > Rossella Sblendido
> 
> 	From: Kyle Mestery <mestery at mestery.com
> <mailto:mestery at mestery.com> >
> 	To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-
> dev at lists.openstack.org> >
> 	Date: 19/01/2016 16:39
> 	Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Team meeting on Tuesday
> 1400UTC
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 	On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
> <ihrachys at redhat.com <mailto:ihrachys at redhat.com> > wrote:
> 	> Rossella Sblendido <rsblendido at suse.com
> <mailto:rsblendido at suse.com> > wrote:
> 	>
> 	>>
> 	>>
> 	>> On 01/19/2016 04:36 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote:
> 	>>>
> 	>>> Thinking of this, I had another idea, a bit raw yet.
> 	>>>
> 	>>> But how does it sound to have two meetings a week, one in a
> EU/ASIA
> 	>>> friendlier
> 	>>> timezone, and another for USA/AU (current one), with different
> chairs.
> 	>>>
> 	>>> We don't impose unnatural-working hours (too early, too late for
> family,
> 	>>> etc..)
> 	>>> to anyone, we encourage gathering as a community (may be
> split by
> 	>>> timezones, but
> 	>>> it feels more human and faster than ML conversations..) and also
> people
> 	>>> able
> 	>>> to make to both, could serve as bridges for both meetings.
> 	>>>
> 	>>>
> 	>>> Thoughts?
> 	>>
> 	>>
> 	>> I think that is what Kyle was proposing and if I am not wrong that's
> what
> 	>> they do in nova.
> 	>
> 	>
> 	> My understanding is that Kyle proposed to switch back to bi-weekly
> 	> alternating meetings, and have a separate chair for each.
> 	>
> 	> I think Kyle’s suggestion is wiser since it won’t leave the community
> split
> 	> into two separate parts, and it won’t waste two hours each week
> where we
> 	> could make it with just one.
> 	>
> 	Yes, I was proposing two bi-weekly meetings with different chairs.
> We
> 	could even have kept the existing schedule and just had a different
> 	chair for the 1400UTC meeting on Tuesday.
> 
> 	> Ihar
> 	>