Open Stack

+1 for Kyle's suggestion

Thanks
Vikram

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Martin Hickey <martin.hickey at ie.ibm.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> +1 for me on Kyle's suggestion.
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Kyle Mestery ---19/01/2016 16:39:05---On
> Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at red]Kyle Mestery
> ---19/01/2016 16:39:05---On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka <
> ihrachys at redhat.com> wrote: > Rossella Sblendido
>
> From: Kyle Mestery <mestery at mestery.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Date: 19/01/2016 16:39
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Team meeting on Tuesday 1400UTC
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > Rossella Sblendido <rsblendido at suse.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 01/19/2016 04:36 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thinking of this, I had another idea, a bit raw yet.
> >>>
> >>> But how does it sound to have two meetings a week, one in a EU/ASIA
> >>> friendlier
> >>> timezone, and another for USA/AU (current one), with different chairs.
> >>>
> >>> We don't impose unnatural-working hours (too early, too late for
> family,
> >>> etc..)
> >>> to anyone, we encourage gathering as a community (may be split by
> >>> timezones, but
> >>> it feels more human and faster than ML conversations..) and also people
> >>> able
> >>> to make to both, could serve as bridges for both meetings.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts?
> >>
> >>
> >> I think that is what Kyle was proposing and if I am not wrong that's
> what
> >> they do in nova.
> >
> >
> > My understanding is that Kyle proposed to switch back to bi-weekly
> > alternating meetings, and have a separate chair for each.
> >
> > I think Kyle’s suggestion is wiser since it won’t leave the community
> split
> > into two separate parts, and it won’t waste two hours each week where we
> > could make it with just one.
> >
> Yes, I was proposing two bi-weekly meetings with different chairs. We
> could even have kept the existing schedule and just had a different
> chair for the 1400UTC meeting on Tuesday.
>
> > Ihar
> >
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160120/64c6b4ea/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160120/64c6b4ea/attachment.gif>