Open Stack

On 11 September 2015 at 11:26, Tony Breeds <tony at bakeyournoodle.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>     In trying to fix a few stable/juno issues we need to release a new version
> of ceilometerclient for stable/juno.  This email is to try and raise awareness
> so that if the proposal is bonkers [1] we can come up with something better.
>
> This isn't currently possible due to the current caps in juno and kilo.
>
> The proposed fix is to:
>
> . update g-r in master (liberty): python-ceilometerclient>=1.2
>   https://review.openstack.org/#/c/222386/
> . update g-r in stable/kilo: python-ceilometerclient>=1.1.1,<1.2
> . release a sync of stable/kilo g-r to stable/kilo python-ceilometerclient as 1.1.1
> . update g-r in stable/juno: python-ceilometerclient<1.1.0,!=1.0.13,!=1.0.14
> . release 1.0.15 with a sync of stable/juno g-r
>
> The point is, leave 1.0.x for juno, 1.1.x for kilo and >=1.2 for liberty
>
> This is being tracked as: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-ceilometerclient/+bug/1494516
>
> There is a secondary issue if getting the (juno) gate in a shape where we can
> actually do all of that.
>
> Yours Tony.
> [1] Bonkers is a recognized technical term right?

That seems like it will work [resists urge to kibbitz on the capping thing].

Perhaps you'd want to add the caps first across all trees, then do the
minimum raising in master/liberty. Seems like J might be a little
unhappy otherwise.

-Rob

-- 
Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hp.com>
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud