[openstack-dev] [ironic] specs process for ironic-inspector

Dmitry Tantsur dtantsur at redhat.com
Thu Nov 19 13:19:56 UTC 2015


Hi folks!

I've been dodging subj for some time (mostly due to my laziness), but 
now it seems like the time has come. We're discussing 2 big features: 
autodiscovery and HA that I would like us to have a proper consensus on.

I'd like to get your opinion on one of the options:
1. Do not have specs, only blueprints are enough for us.
2. Reuse ironic-specs repo, create our own subdirectory with our own 
template
3. Create a new ironic-inspector-specs repo.

I vote for #2, as sharing a repo with the remaining ironic would 
increase visibility of large inspector changes (i.e. those deserving a 
spec). We would probably use [inspector] tag in the commit summary, so 
that people explicitly NOT wanting to review them can quickly ignore.

Also note that I still see #1 (use only blueprints) as a way to go for 
simple features.

WDYT?



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list