Open Stack

On 11 November 2015 at 13:58, Kyle Mestery <mestery at mestery.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Armando M. <armamig at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi neutronians,
>>
>> Whilst I recover from the gate failure binge eating...I wanted to put out
>> there a couple of process changes that should help the drivers team and the
>> PTL to improve their ability to justify priority assignments for new
>> features.
>>
>> Comments welcome.
>>
>>
> I commented in the review, but I thought I'd reply here as well. I don't
> understand the reason to move to only using "High" and "Low" priority, it
> seems somewhat arbitrary. Of course, you could argue our current system for
> prioritizing is arbitrary as well, but I'd argue that utilizing all 4
> priorities makes sense. Ultimately though, this is all mostly arbitrary
> anyways, and we all likely understand the stuff which is important (e.g.
> Essential). We have done a bad job at getting that stuff into a release in
> the past though.
>

Thanks Kyle, I'll elaborate more on the patch.


>
> And now I feel like Salvatore and I'll stop pedantically meandering.
>
>
>> Cheers,
>> Armando
>>
>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/244302/
>> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/244313/
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151111/e5482d51/attachment.html>