<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 11 November 2015 at 13:58, Kyle Mestery <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mestery@mestery.com" target="_blank">mestery@mestery.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><span class="">On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Armando M. <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:armamig@gmail.com" target="_blank">armamig@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></span><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi neutronians,<div><br></div><div>Whilst I recover from the gate failure binge eating...I wanted to put out there a couple of process changes that should help the drivers team and the PTL to improve their ability to justify priority assignments for new features.</div><div><br></div><div>Comments welcome.</div><div><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>I commented in the review, but I thought I'd reply here as well. I don't understand the reason to move to only using "High" and "Low" priority, it seems somewhat arbitrary. Of course, you could argue our current system for prioritizing is arbitrary as well, but I'd argue that utilizing all 4 priorities makes sense. Ultimately though, this is all mostly arbitrary anyways, and we all likely understand the stuff which is important (e.g. Essential). We have done a bad job at getting that stuff into a release in the past though.<br></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Thanks Kyle, I'll elaborate more on the patch.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><br></div><div>And now I feel like Salvatore and I'll stop pedantically meandering.<br></div><div> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=""><div dir="ltr"><div></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Armando</div><div><br></div><div>[1] <a href="https://review.openstack.org/#/c/244302/" target="_blank">https://review.openstack.org/#/c/244302/</a></div><div>[2] <a href="https://review.openstack.org/#/c/244313/" target="_blank">https://review.openstack.org/#/c/244313/</a></div></div>
<br></span>__________________________________________________________________________<br>
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>
<br>__________________________________________________________________________<br>
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>