Open Stack

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Neil Jerram <Neil.Jerram at metaswitch.com>
wrote:

> Hi Andreas,
>
> On 26/06/15 14:04, Andreas Scheuring wrote:
>
>> Hi together,
>> for a new ml2 plugin I would like to pass over some data from neutron to
>> nova on port creation and update (exploiting port binding extension
>> [1]). For my prototype I thought of using one of the following response
>> dictionaries to add my information:
>>
>> - binding:vif_details
>> - binding:profile
>>
>> The API ref describes these attributes (port create / port update - both
>> response) as dictionaries, but without restricting the key-value pairs
>> or naming a defined number [1].
>>
>> I've also seen some other ml2 plugins enriching those fields with unique
>> data. So I assuming this is not considered as an API change, isn't it?
>>
>> Important: It's only about the response. The input comes from a
>> configuration file.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> [1] http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2-ext.html
>>
>
> I think the discussion at [1] is broadly in the same area, so you might
> find some relevant input there.
>
>
This RFE bug [1] isn't going anywhere because it wants to expose data to
the underlying drivers, which is a huge -2 from me because it will allow
complete circumvention of the Neutron API.

Thanks,
Kyle

        Neil
>
>
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1460222
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150626/07a77c52/attachment.html>