Open Stack

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:02:27AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/24/2015 9:09 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 02:51:38PM +0100, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
> >>On 06/24/2015 02:33 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:

[. . .]

> >This is one of the _baffling_ aspects -- that a so-called "super core"
> >has to approve specs with *no* obvious valid reasons.  As Jay Pipes
> >mentioned once, this indeed seems like a vestigial remnant from old
> >times.
> >
> >FWIW, I agree with others on this thread, Nova should get rid of this
> >specific senseless non-process.  At least a couple of cycles ago.
> 
> Specs were only added a couple of cycles ago... :)  And they were added to
> fill a gap, which has already been pointed out in this thread.  So if we
> remove them without a replacement for that gap, we regress.

Oops, I didn't mean to say that "Specs" as a concept should be gone.
Sorr for poor phrasing.

My question was answred by Joe Gordon with this review:

    https://review.openstack.org/#/c/184912/


-- 
/kashyap