Open Stack

Some reasons of having complementary projects in Stackalytics:
 * to compare efforts in other communities with OpenStack - just to feed
curiosity on what is larger OpenStack or Kubernetes?
 * to light interest to contribute to projects that OpenStack depends on,
like OVS and Ansible.
 * to keep an eye on commercial interest and know who is sponsoring near-by
technologies.

I agree that adding complementary projects was an authoritarian decision
and ready to remove them in the community version if TC decides so.

Thanks,
Ilya

2015-06-19 10:48 GMT+03:00 Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>:

> Paul Belanger wrote:
> > I am wondering the reason for the complementary projects listing[1] in
> > Stackalytics?  Specifically, why does stackalytics-processor import
> > docker and cloudfoundry projects into the stats?
> >
> > [1] http://stackalytics.com/?project_type=complementary&metric=commits
>
> It's not a community decision. I'd say it is an editorial decision of
> the current owner of the project and website. While we are trying to
> move this project under the Infra project team and the Technical
> Committee oversight, it is currently still a Stackforge project owned by
> Mirantis.
>
> Personally if we were to move it under Infra I would (1) remove the
> complementary projects and (2) make sure that whoever wants to reuse
> stackalytics code to track Docker / CloudFoundry activity can easily do so.
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150619/9edd6964/attachment.html>