[openstack-dev] [app-catalog][infra] Stale entries

Fox, Kevin M Kevin.Fox at pnnl.gov
Sat Jun 6 17:04:14 UTC 2015

That would be awesome.

Should we start requiring an extra field for maintainer contact email address?


From: Georgy Okrokvertskhov
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2015 7:15:45 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [app-catalog][infra] Stale entries

On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org<mailto:fungi at yuggoth.org>> wrote:
On 2015-06-05 22:04:05 -0700 (-0700), Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote:
> +1 for the periodic job. I don't know how it fits to the current
> OpenStack infrastructure, but we definitely need this. As I know
> there is a place for 3rd party gates and CI\CD systems, so
> probably, the best way to do this for now, is to setup this
> externally to the OpenStack infra.

We have periodic jobs defined in Zuul which do things like rerun
unit or integration tests for projects' stable branches and then
send failure notifications to the stable-maint mailing list. It's
definitely a thing.

This is great. It means that we can use existing OpenStack approach rather then reinventing the wheel.
I think I will be able to create a simple script for URLs verification. It looks pretty straightforward as catalog is in machine friendly format.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150606/93963aac/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list