Open Stack

Thanks Sean, comments inline.

On 6 July 2015 at 16:58, Sean M. Collins <sean at coreitpro.com> wrote:

> I'd also like to chime in - we've had some discussions on -infra today
> about the partial upgrade issue, and collected the following notes on an
> etherpad.
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-partial-upgrades
>
> One of the things identified, was the complexity of the DVR feature in
> Neutron, and an attempt to simplify the partial upgrade job by not
> enabling the DVR feature.
>

The DVR issue is entirely orthogonal to this, but I am willing to play
along.


>
>
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking/2015/networking.2015-07-06-21.00.log.html
>
> Clark Boylan has proposed a patch to create a new job that runs on
> multiple nodes, but does not have DVR enabled, in the hopes that having
> less moving parts will allow the multinode grenade work to continue on a
> parallel track,


Who is leading the Grenade effort? Is it Clark?


> with bugfixes or additional work on the Neutron DVR
> feature not blocking the overall effort. The idea would be eventually to
> enable DVR, once we have taken care of all the other work that needs to
> be done.
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198906/


I thought that's what Joe did in [1]. Am I barking up at the wrong tree?


>
>
> What is everyone's thoughts?
>

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/195259/


>
> --
> Sean M. Collins
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150706/c4e289d9/attachment.html>