[openstack-dev] [grenade] future direction on partial upgrade support

Anita Kuno anteaya at anteaya.info
Tue Jul 7 01:31:26 UTC 2015


On 07/06/2015 09:02 PM, Armando M. wrote:
> Thanks Sean, comments inline.
> 
> On 6 July 2015 at 16:58, Sean M. Collins <sean at coreitpro.com> wrote:
> 
>> I'd also like to chime in - we've had some discussions on -infra today
>> about the partial upgrade issue, and collected the following notes on an
>> etherpad.
>>
>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-partial-upgrades
>>
>> One of the things identified, was the complexity of the DVR feature in
>> Neutron, and an attempt to simplify the partial upgrade job by not
>> enabling the DVR feature.
>>
> 
> The DVR issue is entirely orthogonal to this, but I am willing to play
> along.
> 
> 
>>
>>
>> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking/2015/networking.2015-07-06-21.00.log.html
>>
>> Clark Boylan has proposed a patch to create a new job that runs on
>> multiple nodes, but does not have DVR enabled, in the hopes that having
>> less moving parts will allow the multinode grenade work to continue on a
>> parallel track,
> 
> 
> Who is leading the Grenade effort? Is it Clark?

Actually in terms of who stirred the pot, it's me.

There were too many people talking in too small of groups for me to
stand aside any longer. The grenade job looked like it was going to
continue to get blocked without everyone understanding all the factors
so I wanted to have folks have a discussion.

> 
> 
>> with bugfixes or additional work on the Neutron DVR
>> feature not blocking the overall effort. The idea would be eventually to
>> enable DVR, once we have taken care of all the other work that needs to
>> be done.
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198906/
> 
> 
> I thought that's what Joe did in [1]. Am I barking up at the wrong tree?

Joe did smoke tests in that patch yes. Clark's patch just takes a job
that was already running full tempest and turned it into two tests one
with dvr on and one with dvr off. That is all Clark's patch did.

Thanks,
Anita.

> 
> 
>>
>>
>> What is everyone's thoughts?
>>
> 
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/195259/
> 
> 
>>
>> --
>> Sean M. Collins
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list