Open Stack

Adding the related subject :)

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Mathieu Rohon <mathieu.rohon at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The current bgpvpn implementation is using the service type framework,
> with a service plugin and one or more service providers.
>
> After registering the bug [1], I wonder if we would rather use a service
> plugin per implementation type (bagpipe, ODL, OpenContrail, Nuage...) which
> handles API calls, instead of having one service plugin which forwards API
> calls to a service driver depending on the provider chosen by the end
> user.
>
> I would like to better understand what would be the main drawbacks of such
> a move apart from the fact that a deployment would be tightly coupled to a
> bgpvpn plugin, and multiple implementations of the plugin couldn't coexist.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mathieu
>
> [1]https://bugs.launchpad.net/bgpvpn/+bug/1485515
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150818/3cff5ea9/attachment.html>