Open Stack

Hi,
   Could you provide the link to this code?

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Pradeep Kilambi <pkilambi at redhat.com>
wrote:

> We're in the process of converting existing meters to use a more
> declarative approach where we add the meter definition as part of a yaml.
> As part of this transition there are few notification handlers where the id
> is not consistent. For example, in profiler notification Handler the
> resource_id is set to "profiler-%s" % message["payload"]["base_id"] . Is
> there a reason we have the prefix? Can we ignore this and directly set
> to message["payload"]["base_id"] ? Seems like there is no real need for the
> prefix here unless i'm missing something. Can we go ahead and drop this?
>
> If we don't hear anything i'll assume there is no objection to dropping
> this prefix.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> --
> Pradeep Kilambi; irc: prad
> OpenStack Engineering
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150813/8c595229/attachment.html>