Open Stack

Thanks for the effort Ivan.   Your interest in brick is also helping us 
push forward with the idea of the agent that we've had in mind for quite 
some time.

For those interested, I have created an etherpad that discusses some of 
the requirements and design decisions/discussion on the cinder/storage 
agent
here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-storage-agent


Walt


> Thanks a lot for a comments!
>
> As discussed in IRC (#openstack-cinder), moving Brick to Oslo or 
> Stackforge isn't the best solution.
>
> We're moving on making Cinder Agent (or Cinder Storage agent) [1] 
>  based on Brick code instead of making Brick as a separate python 
> library used in Cinder and Nova.
>
> I'll deprecate my oslo.storage GitHub repo and rename it to not 
> confuse anybody in a future.
>
> [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-storage-agent
>
> Regards,
> Ivan Kolodyazhny,
> Web Developer,
> http://blog.e0ne.info/,
> http://notacash.com/,
> http://kharkivpy.org.ua/
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Davanum Srinivas <davanum at gmail.com 
> <mailto:davanum at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     +1 to Doug's comments.
>
>     On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Doug Hellmann
>     <doug at doughellmann.com <mailto:doug at doughellmann.com>> wrote:
>     >
>     > On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:02 PM, Flavio Percoco <flavio at redhat.com
>     <mailto:flavio at redhat.com>> wrote:
>     >
>     >> On 09/16/2014 11:55 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>     >>> Based on my reading of the wiki page about this it sounds like
>     it should
>     >>> be a sub-project of the Storage program. While it is targeted
>     for use
>     >>> by multiple projects, it's pretty specific to interacting with
>     Cinder,
>     >>> right?  If so, it seems like Oslo wouldn't be a good fit. 
>     We'd just end
>     >>> up adding all of cinder-core to the project anyway. :-)
>     >>
>     >> +1 I think the same arguments and conclusions we had on
>     glance-store
>     >> make sense here. I'd probably go with having it under the Block
>     Storage
>     >> program.
>     >
>     > I agree. I’m sure we could find some Oslo contributors to give
>     you advice about APIs if you like, but I don’t think the library
>     needs to be part of Oslo to be reusable.
>     >
>     > Doug
>     >
>     >>
>     >> Flavio
>     >>
>     >>>
>     >>> -Ben
>     >>>
>     >>> On 09/16/2014 12:49 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
>     >>>> Hi Stackers!
>     >>>>
>     >>>> I'm working on moving Brick out of Cinder for K release.
>     >>>>
>     >>>> There're a lot of open questions for now:
>     >>>>
>     >>>>   - Should we move it to oslo or somewhere on stackforge?
>     >>>>   - Better architecture of it to fit all Cinder and Nova
>     requirements
>     >>>>   - etc.
>     >>>>
>     >>>> Before starting discussion, I've created some
>     proof-of-concept to try it. I
>     >>>> moved Brick to some lib named oslo.storage for testing only.
>     It's only one
>     >>>> of the possible solution to start work on it.
>     >>>>
>     >>>> All sources are aviable on GitHub [1], [2].
>     >>>>
>     >>>> [1] - I'm not sure that this place and name is good for it,
>     it's just a PoC.
>     >>>>
>     >>>> [1] https://github.com/e0ne/oslo.storage
>     >>>> [2] https://github.com/e0ne/cinder/tree/brick - some tests
>     still failed.
>     >>>>
>     >>>> Regards,
>     >>>> Ivan Kolodyazhny
>     >>>>
>     >>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny
>     <e0ne at e0ne.info <mailto:e0ne at e0ne.info>> wrote:
>     >>>>
>     >>>>> Hi All!
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> I would to start moving Cinder Brick [1] to oslo as was
>     described on
>     >>>>> Cinder mid-cycle meetup [2]. Unfortunately I missed meetup
>     so I want be
>     >>>>> sure that nobody started it and we are on the same page.
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> According to the Juno 3 release, there was not enough time
>     to discuss [3]
>     >>>>> on the latest Cinder weekly meeting and I would like to get
>     some feedback
>     >>>>> from the all OpenStack community, so I propose to start this
>     discussion on
>     >>>>> mailing list for all projects.
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> I anybody didn't started it and it is useful at least for
>     both Nova and
>     >>>>> Cinder I would to start this work according oslo guidelines
>     [4] and
>     >>>>> creating needed blueprints to make it finished until Kilo 1
>     is over.
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderBrick
>     >>>>> [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-meetup-summer-2014
>     >>>>> [3]
>     >>>>>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/044608.html
>     >>>>> [4] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo/CreatingANewLibrary
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> Regards,
>     >>>>> Ivan Kolodyazhny.
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>
>     >>>>
>     >>>>
>     >>>> _______________________________________________
>     >>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>     >>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>     >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>     >>>>
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>> _______________________________________________
>     >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>     >>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>     >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>     >>>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> --
>     >> @flaper87
>     >> Flavio Percoco
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>     >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>     >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>     >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>     > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>     > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>     --
>     Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     OpenStack-dev mailing list
>     OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140917/9cec8aee/attachment.html>