Open Stack

On Sep 17, 2014 3:48 PM, "Walter A. Boring IV" <walter.boring at hp.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the effort Ivan.   Your interest in brick is also helping us
push forward with the idea of the agent that we've had in mind for quite
some time.
>
> For those interested, I have created an etherpad that discusses some of
the requirements and design decisions/discussion on the cinder/storage
agent
> here:
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-storage-agent
>
>
> Walt
>
>
>> Thanks a lot for a comments!
>>
>> As discussed in IRC (#openstack-cinder), moving Brick to Oslo or
Stackforge isn't the best solution.
>>
>> We're moving on making Cinder Agent (or Cinder Storage agent) [1]  based
on Brick code instead of making Brick as a separate python library used in
Cinder and Nova.
>>
>> I'll deprecate my oslo.storage GitHub repo and rename it to not confuse
anybody in a future.
>>
>> [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-storage-agent
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ivan Kolodyazhny,
>> Web Developer,
>> http://blog.e0ne.info/,
>> http://notacash.com/,
>> http://kharkivpy.org.ua/
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Davanum Srinivas <davanum at gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 to Doug's comments.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com>
wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:02 PM, Flavio Percoco <flavio at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On 09/16/2014 11:55 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>>> >>> Based on my reading of the wiki page about this it sounds like it
should
>>> >>> be a sub-project of the Storage program.  While it is targeted for
use
>>> >>> by multiple projects, it's pretty specific to interacting with
Cinder,
>>> >>> right?  If so, it seems like Oslo wouldn't be a good fit.  We'd
just end
>>> >>> up adding all of cinder-core to the project anyway. :-)
>>> >>
>>> >> +1 I think the same arguments and conclusions we had on glance-store
>>> >> make sense here. I'd probably go with having it under the Block
Storage
>>> >> program.
>>> >
>>> > I agree. I’m sure we could find some Oslo contributors to give you
advice about APIs if you like, but I don’t think the library needs to be
part of Oslo to be reusable.
>>> >
>>> > Doug
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> Flavio
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -Ben
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 09/16/2014 12:49 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
>>> >>>> Hi Stackers!
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I'm working on moving Brick out of Cinder for K release.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> There're a lot of open questions for now:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>   - Should we move it to oslo or somewhere on stackforge?
>>> >>>>   - Better architecture of it to fit all Cinder and Nova
requirements
>>> >>>>   - etc.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Before starting discussion, I've created some proof-of-concept to
try it. I
>>> >>>> moved Brick to some lib named oslo.storage for testing only. It's
only one
>>> >>>> of the possible solution to start work on it.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> All sources are aviable on GitHub [1], [2].
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> [1] - I'm not sure that this place and name is good for it, it's
just a PoC.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> [1] https://github.com/e0ne/oslo.storage
>>> >>>> [2] https://github.com/e0ne/cinder/tree/brick - some tests still
failed.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Regards,
>>> >>>> Ivan Kolodyazhny
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny <e0ne at e0ne.info>
wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> Hi All!
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> I would to start moving Cinder Brick [1] to oslo as was described
on
>>> >>>>> Cinder mid-cycle meetup [2]. Unfortunately I missed meetup so I
want be
>>> >>>>> sure that nobody started it and we are on the same page.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> According to the Juno 3 release, there was not enough time to
discuss [3]
>>> >>>>> on the latest Cinder weekly meeting and I would like to get some
feedback
>>> >>>>> from the all OpenStack community, so I propose to start this
discussion on
>>> >>>>> mailing list for all projects.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> I anybody didn't started it and it is useful at least for both
Nova and
>>> >>>>> Cinder I would to start this work according oslo guidelines [4]
and
>>> >>>>> creating needed blueprints to make it finished until Kilo 1 is
over.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderBrick
>>> >>>>> [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-meetup-summer-2014
>>> >>>>> [3]
>>> >>>>>
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/044608.html
>>> >>>>> [4] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo/CreatingANewLibrary
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Regards,
>>> >>>>> Ivan Kolodyazhny.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> >>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> >>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> @flaper87
>>> >> Flavio Percoco
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

FWIW my take has been storage lib, not Oslo.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140917/12a5bff4/attachment.html>