Open Stack

Thanks a lot for a comments!

As discussed in IRC (#openstack-cinder), moving Brick to Oslo or Stackforge
isn't the best solution.

We're moving on making Cinder Agent (or Cinder Storage agent) [1]  based on
Brick code instead of making Brick as a separate python library used in
Cinder and Nova.

I'll deprecate my oslo.storage GitHub repo and rename it to not confuse
anybody in a future.

[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-storage-agent

Regards,
Ivan Kolodyazhny,
Web Developer,
http://blog.e0ne.info/,
http://notacash.com/,
http://kharkivpy.org.ua/

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Davanum Srinivas <davanum at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 to Doug's comments.
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:02 PM, Flavio Percoco <flavio at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 09/16/2014 11:55 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> >>> Based on my reading of the wiki page about this it sounds like it
> should
> >>> be a sub-project of the Storage program.  While it is targeted for use
> >>> by multiple projects, it's pretty specific to interacting with Cinder,
> >>> right?  If so, it seems like Oslo wouldn't be a good fit.  We'd just
> end
> >>> up adding all of cinder-core to the project anyway. :-)
> >>
> >> +1 I think the same arguments and conclusions we had on glance-store
> >> make sense here. I'd probably go with having it under the Block Storage
> >> program.
> >
> > I agree. I’m sure we could find some Oslo contributors to give you
> advice about APIs if you like, but I don’t think the library needs to be
> part of Oslo to be reusable.
> >
> > Doug
> >
> >>
> >> Flavio
> >>
> >>>
> >>> -Ben
> >>>
> >>> On 09/16/2014 12:49 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
> >>>> Hi Stackers!
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm working on moving Brick out of Cinder for K release.
> >>>>
> >>>> There're a lot of open questions for now:
> >>>>
> >>>>   - Should we move it to oslo or somewhere on stackforge?
> >>>>   - Better architecture of it to fit all Cinder and Nova requirements
> >>>>   - etc.
> >>>>
> >>>> Before starting discussion, I've created some proof-of-concept to try
> it. I
> >>>> moved Brick to some lib named oslo.storage for testing only. It's
> only one
> >>>> of the possible solution to start work on it.
> >>>>
> >>>> All sources are aviable on GitHub [1], [2].
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] - I'm not sure that this place and name is good for it, it's just
> a PoC.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://github.com/e0ne/oslo.storage
> >>>> [2] https://github.com/e0ne/cinder/tree/brick - some tests still
> failed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Ivan Kolodyazhny
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny <e0ne at e0ne.info>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi All!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I would to start moving Cinder Brick [1] to oslo as was described on
> >>>>> Cinder mid-cycle meetup [2]. Unfortunately I missed meetup so I want
> be
> >>>>> sure that nobody started it and we are on the same page.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> According to the Juno 3 release, there was not enough time to
> discuss [3]
> >>>>> on the latest Cinder weekly meeting and I would like to get some
> feedback
> >>>>> from the all OpenStack community, so I propose to start this
> discussion on
> >>>>> mailing list for all projects.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I anybody didn't started it and it is useful at least for both Nova
> and
> >>>>> Cinder I would to start this work according oslo guidelines [4] and
> >>>>> creating needed blueprints to make it finished until Kilo 1 is over.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderBrick
> >>>>> [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-meetup-summer-2014
> >>>>> [3]
> >>>>>
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/044608.html
> >>>>> [4] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo/CreatingANewLibrary
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Ivan Kolodyazhny.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> @flaper87
> >> Flavio Percoco
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140917/c1aa61fb/attachment.html>