Open Stack

+1 to Doug's comments.

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com> wrote:
>
> On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:02 PM, Flavio Percoco <flavio at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 09/16/2014 11:55 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>>> Based on my reading of the wiki page about this it sounds like it should
>>> be a sub-project of the Storage program.  While it is targeted for use
>>> by multiple projects, it's pretty specific to interacting with Cinder,
>>> right?  If so, it seems like Oslo wouldn't be a good fit.  We'd just end
>>> up adding all of cinder-core to the project anyway. :-)
>>
>> +1 I think the same arguments and conclusions we had on glance-store
>> make sense here. I'd probably go with having it under the Block Storage
>> program.
>
> I agree. I’m sure we could find some Oslo contributors to give you advice about APIs if you like, but I don’t think the library needs to be part of Oslo to be reusable.
>
> Doug
>
>>
>> Flavio
>>
>>>
>>> -Ben
>>>
>>> On 09/16/2014 12:49 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
>>>> Hi Stackers!
>>>>
>>>> I'm working on moving Brick out of Cinder for K release.
>>>>
>>>> There're a lot of open questions for now:
>>>>
>>>>   - Should we move it to oslo or somewhere on stackforge?
>>>>   - Better architecture of it to fit all Cinder and Nova requirements
>>>>   - etc.
>>>>
>>>> Before starting discussion, I've created some proof-of-concept to try it. I
>>>> moved Brick to some lib named oslo.storage for testing only. It's only one
>>>> of the possible solution to start work on it.
>>>>
>>>> All sources are aviable on GitHub [1], [2].
>>>>
>>>> [1] - I'm not sure that this place and name is good for it, it's just a PoC.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://github.com/e0ne/oslo.storage
>>>> [2] https://github.com/e0ne/cinder/tree/brick - some tests still failed.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Ivan Kolodyazhny
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny <e0ne at e0ne.info> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All!
>>>>>
>>>>> I would to start moving Cinder Brick [1] to oslo as was described on
>>>>> Cinder mid-cycle meetup [2]. Unfortunately I missed meetup so I want be
>>>>> sure that nobody started it and we are on the same page.
>>>>>
>>>>> According to the Juno 3 release, there was not enough time to discuss [3]
>>>>> on the latest Cinder weekly meeting and I would like to get some feedback
>>>>> from the all OpenStack community, so I propose to start this discussion on
>>>>> mailing list for all projects.
>>>>>
>>>>> I anybody didn't started it and it is useful at least for both Nova and
>>>>> Cinder I would to start this work according oslo guidelines [4] and
>>>>> creating needed blueprints to make it finished until Kilo 1 is over.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderBrick
>>>>> [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-meetup-summer-2014
>>>>> [3]
>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/044608.html
>>>>> [4] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo/CreatingANewLibrary
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Ivan Kolodyazhny.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> @flaper87
>> Flavio Percoco
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims