Open Stack

+1. Count me in. Susanne


On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Stephen Wong <s3wong at midokura.com> wrote:

> +1 - that is a good idea! Having it several days before the J-Summit in
> Atlanta would be great.
>
> - Stephen
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Eugene Nikanorov <enikanorov at mirantis.com>wrote:
>
>> I think mini summit is no worse than the summit itself.
>> Everyone who wants to participate can join.
>> In fact what we really need is a certain time span of focused work.
>> ML, meetings are ok, it's just that dedicated in person meetings (design
>> sessions) could be more productive.
>> I'm thinking what if such mini-summit is held in Atlanta 1-2-3 days prior
>> to the OS summit?
>> That could save attendees a lot of time/money.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eugene.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Mark McClain <mmcclain at yahoo-inc.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 6, 2014, at 4:31 PM, Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 21:14 +0000, Youcef Laribi wrote:
>>> >> +1
>>> >>
>>> >> I think if we can have it before the Juno summit, we can take
>>> >> concrete, well thought-out proposals to the community at the summit.
>>> >
>>> > Unless something has changed starting at the Hong Kong design summit
>>> > (which unfortunately I was not able to attend), the design summits have
>>> > always been a place to gather to *discuss* and *debate* proposed
>>> > blueprints and design specs. It has never been about a gathering to
>>> > rubber-stamp proposals that have already been hashed out in private
>>> > somewhere else.
>>>
>>> You are correct that is the goal of the design summit.  While I do think
>>> it is wise to discuss the next steps with LBaaS at this point in time, I am
>>> not a proponent of in person mini-design summits.  Many contributors to
>>> LBaaS are distributed all over the global, and scheduling a mini summit
>>> with short notice will exclude valuable contributors to the team.  I'd
>>> prefer to see an open process with discussions on the mailing list and
>>> specially scheduled IRC meetings to discuss the ideas.
>>>
>>> mark
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140310/60470d93/attachment.html>