[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Mini-summit Interest?

Stephen Wong s3wong at midokura.com
Fri Mar 7 15:06:27 UTC 2014


+1 - that is a good idea! Having it several days before the J-Summit in
Atlanta would be great.

- Stephen


On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Eugene Nikanorov <enikanorov at mirantis.com>wrote:

> I think mini summit is no worse than the summit itself.
> Everyone who wants to participate can join.
> In fact what we really need is a certain time span of focused work.
> ML, meetings are ok, it's just that dedicated in person meetings (design
> sessions) could be more productive.
> I'm thinking what if such mini-summit is held in Atlanta 1-2-3 days prior
> to the OS summit?
> That could save attendees a lot of time/money.
>
> Thanks,
> Eugene.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Mark McClain <mmcclain at yahoo-inc.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 6, 2014, at 4:31 PM, Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 21:14 +0000, Youcef Laribi wrote:
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> I think if we can have it before the Juno summit, we can take
>> >> concrete, well thought-out proposals to the community at the summit.
>> >
>> > Unless something has changed starting at the Hong Kong design summit
>> > (which unfortunately I was not able to attend), the design summits have
>> > always been a place to gather to *discuss* and *debate* proposed
>> > blueprints and design specs. It has never been about a gathering to
>> > rubber-stamp proposals that have already been hashed out in private
>> > somewhere else.
>>
>> You are correct that is the goal of the design summit.  While I do think
>> it is wise to discuss the next steps with LBaaS at this point in time, I am
>> not a proponent of in person mini-design summits.  Many contributors to
>> LBaaS are distributed all over the global, and scheduling a mini summit
>> with short notice will exclude valuable contributors to the team.  I'd
>> prefer to see an open process with discussions on the mailing list and
>> specially scheduled IRC meetings to discuss the ideas.
>>
>> mark
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140307/0ddef679/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list