On 10 June 2014 12:11, John Garbutt <john at johngarbutt.com> wrote: > There was a spec I read that was related to this idea of excluding > things that don't match the filter. I can't seem to find that, but the > general idea makes total sense. > > As a heads up, the scheduler split means we are wanting to change how > the aggregate filters are working, more towards this direction, > proposed by Jay: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98664/ > Thanks John. If I understand it correctly, once Jay's patch lands (assuming it does), then we can simply use the aggregate data returned through the same method to get the aggregate filter_tenant_id and filter_tenant_exclusive values for all the hosts in one go, making it much quicker and simpler to pass or fail the hosts? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140610/aa5cc288/attachment.html>