Open Stack

Hi Jesse,

it would be great collaborate with you on this.



No, I didn’t update to nova-specs yet.

It would be good to discuss on IRC. My nick is belmoreira.



Belmiro

----------------------------------

Belmiro Moreira

CERN

Email: belmiro.moreira at cern.ch

IRC: belmoreira


On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Jesse Pretorius <jesse.pretorius at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 9 June 2014 15:18, Belmiro Moreira <
> moreira.belmiro.email.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I would say that is a documentation bug for the
>> “AggregateMultiTenancyIsolation” filter.
>>
>
> Great, thanks. I've logged a bug for this:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1328400
>
>
>> When this was implemented the objective was to schedule only instances
>> from specific tenants for those aggregates but not make them exclusive.
>>
>>
>> That’s why the work on
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multi-tenancy-isolation-only-aggregates
>> started but was left on hold because it was believed
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/whole-host-allocation had
>> some similarities and eventually could solve the problem in a more generic
>> way.
>>
>>
>> However p-clouds implementation is marked as “slow progress” and I
>> believe there is no active work at the moment.
>>
>>
>> Probably is a good time to review the "ProjectsToAggregateFilter" filter
>> again. The implementation and reviews are available at
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/28635/
>>
>
> Agreed. p-clouds is a much greater framework with much deeper and wider
> effects. The isolated aggregate which you submitted code for is exactly
> what we're looking for and actually what we're using in production today.
>
> I'm proposing that we put together the nova-spec for
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multi-tenancy-isolation-only-aggregates,
> but as suggested in my earlier message I think a simpler approach would be
> to modify the existing filter to meet our needs by simply using an
> additional metadata tag to designate the aggregate as an exclusive one. In
> the blueprint you did indicate that you were going to put together a
> nova-spec for it, but I couldn't find one in the specs repository - either
> merged or WIP.
>
>
>> One of the problems raised was performance concerns considering the
>> number of DB queries required. However this can be documented if people
>> intend to enable the filter.
>>
>
> As suggested by Phil Day in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/28635/ there
> is now a caching capability (landed in
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33720/) which reduces the number of DB
> calls.
>
> Can I suggest that we collaborate on the spec? Perhaps we can discuss this
> on IRC? My nick is odyssey4me and I'm in #openstack much of the typical
> working day and often in the evenings. My time zone is GMT+2.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140610/f0f5c9c4/attachment.html>