Open Stack

I think the point is that if there were discussions that lead to
uncertainty about the split, they should have resulted in a - 1/-2 on the
spec instead of letting it sit there.
On Aug 29, 2014 9:46 AM, "Jay Pipes" <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 08/29/2014 12:25 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
>
>> On 28/08/14 17:02, Jay Pipes wrote:
>>
>>> I understand your frustration about the silence, but the silence from
>>> core team members may actually be a loud statement about where their
>>> priorities are.
>>>
>>
>> I don't know enough about the Nova review situation to say if the
>> process is broken or not. But I can say that if passive-aggressively
>> ignoring people is considered a primary communication channel, something
>> is definitely broken.
>>
>
> Nobody is ignoring anyone. There have ongoing conversations about the
> scheduler and Gantt, and those conversations haven't resulted in all the
> decisions that Don would like. That is unfortunate, but it's not a sign of
> a broken process.
>
> -jay
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140829/0fddd8e2/attachment.html>