Open Stack

On 05/31/2013 09:34 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05/31/2013 08:45 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 08:06 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
>>> And if that's true... why not just give the flat 11 a shot. If it seems 
>>> to work, cool. Super low maintenance, no bikeshedding on categories, no 
>>> PTL growth concerns blocking things from getting incubated.
>>>
>>> If not, in 6 months or a year we revisit. Which we'd have to do on any 
>>> category based model anyway. If OpenStack has taught me anything, it's 
>>> that predicting where OpenStack is going to be in a year is really hard. 
>>> Encoding the future structure of the TC, based on a snapshot of what 
>>> OpenStack seems to care about today, just seems doomed to unoptimal results. 
>>
>> That's very much my feeling too.
>>
>> I'm actually pretty disappointed that some of us see so much danger!
>> (Will Robinson) in the flat 11 model.
> 
> After having pounced on you in the last one, let me be more positive
> with this one.
> 
> I think you're right here- I think we've done an excellent job of
> building a community of amazing people. Everyone on the TC are stand-up
> folks with the project's best interests at heart.
> 
> So I don't think that flat 11 will be an actual problem, and I'm happy
> to go down that road.

Huge +1 from me.  This is what I'd really like to try right now.

-- 
Russell Bryant