Open Stack

On 05/31/2013 08:45 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 08:06 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
>> And if that's true... why not just give the flat 11 a shot. If it seems 
>> to work, cool. Super low maintenance, no bikeshedding on categories, no 
>> PTL growth concerns blocking things from getting incubated.
>>
>> If not, in 6 months or a year we revisit. Which we'd have to do on any 
>> category based model anyway. If OpenStack has taught me anything, it's 
>> that predicting where OpenStack is going to be in a year is really hard. 
>> Encoding the future structure of the TC, based on a snapshot of what 
>> OpenStack seems to care about today, just seems doomed to unoptimal results. 
> 
> That's very much my feeling too.
> 
> I'm actually pretty disappointed that some of us see so much danger!
> (Will Robinson) in the flat 11 model.

After having pounced on you in the last one, let me be more positive
with this one.

I think you're right here- I think we've done an excellent job of
building a community of amazing people. Everyone on the TC are stand-up
folks with the project's best interests at heart.

So I don't think that flat 11 will be an actual problem, and I'm happy
to go down that road.

Monty