Open Stack

On 31/05/13 09:34 -0400, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
>
>On 05/31/2013 08:45 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 08:06 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
>>> And if that's true... why not just give the flat 11 a shot. If it seems
>>> to work, cool. Super low maintenance, no bikeshedding on categories, no
>>> PTL growth concerns blocking things from getting incubated.
>>>
>>> If not, in 6 months or a year we revisit. Which we'd have to do on any
>>> category based model anyway. If OpenStack has taught me anything, it's
>>> that predicting where OpenStack is going to be in a year is really hard.
>>> Encoding the future structure of the TC, based on a snapshot of what
>>> OpenStack seems to care about today, just seems doomed to unoptimal results.
>>
>> That's very much my feeling too.
>>
>> I'm actually pretty disappointed that some of us see so much danger!
>> (Will Robinson) in the flat 11 model.
>
>After having pounced on you in the last one, let me be more positive
>with this one.
>
>I think you're right here- I think we've done an excellent job of
>building a community of amazing people. Everyone on the TC are stand-up
>folks with the project's best interests at heart.
>
>So I don't think that flat 11 will be an actual problem, and I'm happy
>to go down that road.
>


FWIW, I think this makes sense.

Cheers,
FF

-- 
{ name: "Flavio Percoco",
   gpg: "87112EC1",
   internal: "8261386",
   phone: "+390687502386",
   irc: ["fpercoco", "flaper87"]}